quote:

Originally posted by lambeausouth:

quote:

Originally posted by the-icon:
I would rather have less points and three more wins.

You would like the Packers to score fewer points, and win more games? Which would mean that the Packer defense would have to play better, no?

No, dumbass. If Rodgers scores less points, we'll win three more games. Defense has nothing to do with it.

Seriously, this icon character cannot be real.

quote:

Originally posted by the-icon:
The avatar is meant to imply anyone but Rodgers.

I would rather have less points and three more wins. Wasn't it Vince who said stats are for losers.

First, Vince said no such thing. At least not according to my recollection, nor according to this web site:
http://www.brainyquote.com/quo.../vince_lombardi.html
Yes, there were references to losing, but not with stats involved.

Personally, I'd like a defense that did nothing but 3 and outs; an offense that scored every possession; and STs that did there job like clockwork. Of course, reality would set in, and we'd get something a little less. But, IMO, to the degree that happens, is the degree GB (or any other team) would experience success. And of course, there would be great stats all the way around.

Finally, it isn't about any one player. It is about the team. So to the extent everyone does their job, the TEAM will be successful.

JMO.