.

TimesFour Chat Room   TimesFour Packers News   Salary Cap Page  

.
    TimesFour  Hop To Forum Categories  Green Bay Packers    How many think that...
Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Picture of mayhem39
Registered: 01-18-2008
Posts: 42
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by Goalline:
quote:
Originally posted by mayhem39:


I put very little blame on Favre in this whole mess. I know I'm in the minority on here with that opinion but that's what I see.



I'm not going to shout you down, unlike others on this board. I just want to know why you feel that way.


First off, I think Favre was pressured into the retirement. I could be wrong on that, but it seems that everything that has happened since he let out that he wanted to come back, TT and MM went right into PR mode. I don't think they wanted him there and that has certainly been proven over the last few days. To me, Favre gives the team the best chance to win and for some reason TT and MM do not want him there. I have not figured out why they don't want him there, but it has certainly been obvious they want to go another route. Why? It's not like Favre has diminished skills. He played great last year. My guess is that Favre is not the only one in Packer land with an ego. I suspect there are some people in the organization that want some of the limelight Brett has received. I don't know, just a theory. There is definitely more to it then Favre waffling in the off season, we are moving forward, Rodgers is our starting QB, and the train has left the station crap that we have been hearing in the media. I'm not buying that stuff for a minute.
Picture of MsPacman
Location: In a state of confusion...
Registered: 03-19-2000
Posts: 3421
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by Packermaniac:
I don't get why people think that Rodgers deserves a shot. He has not earned a thig in this league. I really wish Brett would stay because just look at how Denver and Miami are doing now.

I do hope I am wrong but people have been spoiled for so long that some of the objectivity is clouded.


And how would Denver and Miami be doing if Marino and Elway had stayed another year or two? Same as they are now. Their failure has been an inability to find talent at QB. Keeping Favre isn't going to do a thing to help the future of the Packers. He's not suddenly going to get any better at the age of 39 and in fact he's bound to get worse, much worse, if he stays too long. It's sad to let go of a hero but it's time to move on.
Picture of MsPacman
Location: In a state of confusion...
Registered: 03-19-2000
Posts: 3421
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by mayhem39:
quote:
Originally posted by Goalline:
quote:
Originally posted by mayhem39:


I put very little blame on Favre in this whole mess. I know I'm in the minority on here with that opinion but that's what I see.



I'm not going to shout you down, unlike others on this board. I just want to know why you feel that way.


First off, I think Favre was pressured into the retirement. I could be wrong on that, but it seems that everything that has happened since he let out that he wanted to come back, TT and MM went right into PR mode. I don't think they wanted him there and that has certainly been proven over the last few days. To me, Favre gives the team the best chance to win and for some reason TT and MM do not want him there. I have not figured out why they don't want him there, but it has certainly been obvious they want to go another route. Why? It's not like Favre has diminished skills. He played great last year. My guess is that Favre is not the only one in Packer land with an ego. I suspect there are some people in the organization that want some of the limelight Brett has received. I don't know, just a theory. There is definitely more to it then Favre waffling in the off season, we are moving forward, Rodgers is our starting QB, and the train has left the station crap that we have been hearing in the media. I'm not buying that stuff for a minute.


Read this bit from a McGinn article. It explains everything pretty well.

quote:
From a purely football perspective, the organizational shift against Favre began that November night in Dallas, gained steam in the arctic cold of Soldier Field and became a blaze during Favre's pathetic second-half showing against the New York Giants with a Super Bowl there for the taking.

Just about everyone who counted in the football department reached the conclusion that Favre could never win another championship. His dismal playoff record in the past decade couldn't be overlooked. And the Packers concluded that it would be the mother of all mistakes if Aaron Rodgers got away without being properly evaluated as a starter.

Favre had one chance, and one chance only, to salvage his career in Green Bay. He had to commit wholeheartedly for another season by early March.

One could argue that the Packers erred by asking Favre for an answer that early. But having been hung out to dry by Favre too often in the past, they were in no mood for drama. Their days of mollycoddling were over.

The Packers would have taken back Favre as the starter, albeit reluctantly, if he had acted like any other player and not some diva. That is, show up for work in late March, practice until mid-June and be in exceptional condition by July 28.

That's never too much to expect.

Once Favre tearfully retired, the die was cast. The singular comment made by Favre on March 6 that remains etched indelibly was his admission that he really didn't want the ball in the clutch anymore.

After that, the Packers cut the cord, and rightly so. Favre had come across to most as an emotionally spent 38-year-old with nothing left athletically that he cared to give.

Shortly after the draft, Mike McCarthy basically told his players that he was in charge of this team, not Favre, and that it was critical to rally around Rodgers. Then Rodgers began inviting players to his home. To McCarthy, the off-season is absolutely crucial, and with his entire being he anointed Rodgers.

Picture of JJSD
Location: San Diego
Registered: 12-19-2005
Posts: 7306
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by :
Its that soft west coast thing I speak about. A mixture of metrosexual and prickish surfer dude that is hard to buy into. I think that was part of the undoing of Harrington.


haha haha haha haha

That's the most geenyous take of the day. Even for you, that's an absolute gem.
Picture of rastapackermon
Location: Windsor, WI
Registered: 05-16-2000
Posts: 722
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by Packermaniac:
I don't get why people think that Rodgers deserves a shot. He has not earned a thig in this league. I really wish Brett would stay because just look at how Denver and Miami are doing now.

I do hope I am wrong but people have been spoiled for so long that some of the objectivity is clouded.


You're right, you don't get it and your objectivity is clouded by hero worship.

Rather than rehash for the umpteen-millionth time, I propose that the recent McGinn article be the first thing everybody sees when they log in. It could well erase the ridiculous notion that TT is somehow the bad guy here. I can't wait for this trade to happen so we can finally stop reliving this nightmare (Brett created) once and for all.
Picture of The Artist fka TD
Location: Somewhere
Registered: 02-02-2000
Posts: 13595
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by Packermaniac:
I don't get why people think that Rodgers deserves a shot. He has not earned a thig in this league. I really wish Brett would stay because just look at how Denver and Miami are doing now.

I do hope I am wrong but people have been spoiled for so long that some of the objectivity is clouded.


Why? First off they spent a first round pick and have been grooming him as Favre's replacement. Second, he was told it was his team now and Brett left because Brett was mad.
Picture of Goalline
Location: "beat me like a rented mule" - Henry
Registered: 02-02-2000
Posts: 20180
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by mayhem39:
quote:
Originally posted by Goalline:
quote:
Originally posted by mayhem39:


I put very little blame on Favre in this whole mess. I know I'm in the minority on here with that opinion but that's what I see.



I'm not going to shout you down, unlike others on this board. I just want to know why you feel that way.


First off, I think Favre was pressured into the retirement. I could be wrong on that, but it seems that everything that has happened since he let out that he wanted to come back, TT and MM went right into PR mode. I don't think they wanted him there and that has certainly been proven over the last few days. To me, Favre gives the team the best chance to win and for some reason TT and MM do not want him there. I have not figured out why they don't want him there, but it has certainly been obvious they want to go another route. Why? It's not like Favre has diminished skills. He played great last year. My guess is that Favre is not the only one in Packer land with an ego. I suspect there are some people in the organization that want some of the limelight Brett has received. I don't know, just a theory. There is definitely more to it then Favre waffling in the off season, we are moving forward, Rodgers is our starting QB, and the train has left the station crap that we have been hearing in the media. I'm not buying that stuff for a minute.


Mayhem, if you listen to the parties who have done their homework it is clear what happened. Leave out the Peter Kings and Chris Mortensons out of the equation. They are not impartial. Instead listen to the impartial parties. Folks like Leroy Butley, Jay Glazer, Bob McGinn, Jason Wilde, and even quotes from Brett himself. Listen to what they have to say and it is clear what happened. Now, whether you agree with it is a different matter.
Picture of The Artist fka TD
Location: Somewhere
Registered: 02-02-2000
Posts: 13595
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Favre was forced into retirement?

Yeah, TT held a gun to Randy's head telling him to sign with NE.
Picture of the-icon
Location: parts unknown
Registered: 02-04-2000
Posts: 7199
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
So Favre made a bad read against the Giants. He did something similar against the Eagles like 5 years ago. The team had no running game and Harris was being abused. The Giants then gave Brady a beating. Maybe the Giants were simply a better team. And frankly in my opinion McCarthy got outcoached which didn't help.

Bad game in Dallas, when has he ever had a good game in Dallas.

Favre not commited? 2 years ago he gave the interview with Mortensen where he said he wasn't sure if he wanted the ball with the game on the line.



I accept that notion that there comes a time to move on. But not this year, and not with Rodgers.


Mccarthy, TT, Rodgers are in the same boat with massive pressure on them to somehow put together a season where they make the playoffs. I would be shocked if they win 8 games this year, but will just have to see.
Picture of The GBP Rules
Location: Hastings, MN
Registered: 02-03-2000
Posts: 13276
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
You sure are going to have fun rooting against the Packers this year with all the other Green Bay Favre fans.
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2 3  
 

    TimesFour  Hop To Forum Categories  Green Bay Packers    How many think that...

©2000 - 2008 TimesFour