.

TimesFour Chat Room   TimesFour Packers News   Salary Cap Page  

.
    TimesFour  Hop To Forum Categories  Green Bay Packers    Packers better suited for @Dallas?
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Picture of njs III
Registered: 12-05-2004
Posts: 317
Posted   Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Anyone else think that this team is better suited to play at Dallas (hopefully it will come to that) instead of at Green Bay. I think Barber would be an absolute beast at Lambeau in the crappy weather and the 5 wide set would be better suited for the turf. This is strictly based on the team types and not if they would have a better shot at winning.
Picture of Boris
Location: Siberia
Registered: 01-10-2004
Posts: 10423
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Emmitt Smith says the Packers need HFA more than the Cowboys because Favre is 0-9 in Dallas.
Picture of Brak
Location: Ghost Planet
Registered: 08-14-2001
Posts: 8723
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
I couldn't say whether the Packers are better suited for Dallas or not, but, as a fan, I would have no problem playing them at either place. Green Bay can beat them. - a Favre meltdown, of course. Smiler
Picture of Blair Kiel
Location: Responsible posting since 2006
Registered: 01-22-2002
Posts: 9718
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by FRZ:
Emmitt Smith says the Packers need HFA more than the Cowboys because Favre is 0-9 in Dallas.


Then I'm going the opposite. Guys Wonderlic score made Vince Young the valedictorian of football.
Picture of Grave Digger
Location: The shed behind Boris Castle.
Registered: 03-20-2005
Posts: 6684
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Tom Jackson then called him out for being the biggest Dallas fan ever. I thought it was pretty funny. Key and Jackson seemed to lean towards Dallas needing HFA more than Green Bay and Ditka said both sides need it the same.
Picture of njs III
Registered: 12-05-2004
Posts: 317
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
I stopped caring what those puppets at ESPN said a long time ago. I was looking for opinions that mattered and I heard sounds coming from the bathroom that are more intelligent that that marbled mouth idiot, E. Smith.
Max
Picture of Max
Registered: 01-11-2002
Posts: 10893
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Homefield is an advantage. I'd rather the Packers have it than Dallas. Barber's a beast in Dallas and definitely fires up the fans (and maybe vice-versa). Maybe our 5-wides are faster on turf, but so is the Dallas pass rush that injured Favre last month. We're much better off playing at home.
Picture of BILL H
Location: NEGAUNEE MI USA
Registered: 06-15-2000
Posts: 2948
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Dallas does not have a sterling record playing in Green Bay by any means and it SEEMS that the Packers have had to go to Dallas forever and try to win a game,let Dallas go to Green Bay and find out roses dont grow in the snow and neither do wins.
Picture of Pakrz
Location: Don't eat the yellow snow.
Registered: 04-03-2004
Posts: 3181
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by FRZ:
Emmitt Smith says the Packers need HFA more than the Cowboys because Favre is 0-9 in Dallas.


Emmitt's next complete sentence will be his first. I can't believe they have that idot on TV.
Picture of missingU92
Location: Stevens Point, Wisconsin
Registered: 02-02-2000
Posts: 2163
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by njs III:
I stopped caring what those puppets at ESPN said a long time ago. I was looking for opinions that mattered...


Then what are you doing here? Wink

I'd still prefer the game at Lambeau. Bad weather may hinder the long passes by Romo that hurt us in Dallas. The short passing game where we excel would be O.K. and considering the WRs benefits in sloppy weather since they know where they're going.

Barber is a stud , but does that make him a good "mudder"? He'd probably do fine, but I'm curious since he played college ball in a dome and the turf in Dallas.

And finally, I'm sick of having nearly all our games with Dallas down there. Since Brett has been around how many matchups have been in GB? I only recall 1 and I think it was on the opening weekend of a deer gun season and we beat them handily.
Location: Madison, WI USA
Registered: 08-18-2000
Posts: 8055
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
With the way the Packers just played this first half against the Bears (pathetic in almost every department other than 2 runs by Grant), I almost have to believe that a Lambeau Field home game would have little advantage.
Picture of MNPackman
Location: South St Paul MN
Registered: 02-15-2000
Posts: 4205
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
One must keep in mind that these are very extreme conditions today. No guarantee that a January game in Lambeau will have 30+ MPH winds. It will be cold, of course, but the cold is not the problem today.
Picture of Iowacheese
Location: Gods Country
Registered: 05-09-2000
Posts: 10941
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by MNPackman:
One must keep in mind that these are very extreme conditions today. No guarantee that a January game in Lambeau will have 30+ MPH winds. It will be cold, of course, but the cold is not the problem today.


yep pretty easy concept to grasp.
Picture of missingU92
Location: Stevens Point, Wisconsin
Registered: 02-02-2000
Posts: 2163
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
I realize the conditions are extreme, but I would still expect GB to play better. Wow!
Picture of grbaypack
Location: Normal, Illinois
Registered: 01-09-2001
Posts: 5673
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Well, now I'm nervous about the first round game. Another performance anything close to the one today, and the Packer will never make to Dallas.
Picture of missingU92
Location: Stevens Point, Wisconsin
Registered: 02-02-2000
Posts: 2163
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Don't be nervous. We have a bye the 1st round. It's the 2nd round where you should be nervous! happy45
Picture of lovepack
Location: Sumas, WA. with views of Canadia
Registered: 02-19-2000
Posts: 8578
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
If Rodgers plays.... Big Grin
Picture of PDXPackFan
Location: Portland ,Oregon
Registered: 01-05-2004
Posts: 1950
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Hell Yeah!....if we get that far.... evilteeth
Picture of jjwalker
Location: packers
Registered: 10-12-2004
Posts: 577
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
the pressure will be on dallas. the packers will have the "we are playing with house money attitude". I am worried that they may not get there.
Picture of packerboi
Location: East Wing of Boris' Mansion
Registered: 12-17-2000
Posts: 7473
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Temp's weren't the issue. Snow wasn't the issue. It started and ended with the wind if you're going to blame the weather.

In my mind, this team was reading the headlines and the hype that the next 2 games GB would coast. They were totally flat, uninspired and were waiting for someone to hand them a W.
Picture of FreeSafety
Location: Pitying the fools
Registered: 02-02-2000
Posts: 7691
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
The wind excuse is BS. If anybody tries to use it.

Kyle fricken Orton went 8 for 14 and a TD. He had a 101.3 QB rating. And that was including the DROPPED TD BY #87!!!!!!!!

The Bears had no problems punting or with long snaps.
Picture of catts
Location: Arlington, TX - Future home of The Dallas Cowboys, their 1 billion dollar stadium.
Registered: 02-06-2000
Posts: 7588
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by BILL H:
Dallas does not have a sterling record playing in Green Bay by any means and it SEEMS that the Packers have had to go to Dallas forever and try to win a game,let Dallas go to Green Bay and find out roses dont grow in the snow and neither do wins.

Dallas has not lost on the road this season, but have lost two at home so I don't feel at ease about home play-off games.
Picture of Slayer
Location: Breathing the air of desperation
Registered: 12-01-2004
Posts: 3658
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
I would have prefered to see the Pack beat the bears but will have to settle for the bears getting a worse draft pick and believing that orton is there QB of the future. I WANT the pack to go to dalass for the NFC championship. There is no more Lambeau mystique or cold weather advantage. They disappeared years ago. I want Favre to get some payback for those 9 losses in texas. Win or lose thats where I wanted to see it happen.
Picture of JJSD
Location: San Diego
Registered: 12-19-2005
Posts: 7198
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
It ended in 2002, to be exact, and was pounded even further into oblivion in 2004. I agree to a point - GB unfortunately needs good weather, but they NEED to re-establish their home playoff dominance as well.
Picture of catts
Location: Arlington, TX - Future home of The Dallas Cowboys, their 1 billion dollar stadium.
Registered: 02-06-2000
Posts: 7588
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by missingU92:
quote:
Originally posted by njs III:
I stopped caring what those puppets at ESPN said a long time ago. I was looking for opinions that mattered...


Then what are you doing here? Wink

I'd still prefer the game at Lambeau. Bad weather may hinder the long passes by Romo that hurt us in Dallas. The short passing game where we excel would be O.K. and considering the WRs benefits in sloppy weather since they know where they're going.

Barber is a stud , but does that make him a good "mudder"? He'd probably do fine, but I'm curious since he played college ball in a dome and the turf in Dallas.

And finally, I'm sick of having nearly all our games with Dallas down there. Since Brett has been around how many matchups have been in GB? I only recall 1 and I think it was on the opening weekend of a deer gun season and we beat them handily.

How many of those 9 games in Dallas were post season games and determined by seeding?
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2