Read-Only TopicGo ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() |
Location: South Dakota Registered: 05-02-2000 Posts: 9223 |
Henry, I like ya, I really do. You are talking apples and oranges. Fine, I am a conspiracy priest. Perhaps I am the spawn of satan himself. Irrelevant. And perhaps my life is a complete fantasy. Also irrelevant. There are forum guidelines. Why don't you just adhere to them? It really upsets me. |
Location: Carol Stream, IL Registered: 04-12-2000 Posts: 8313 |
Favre wasn't even close to good last night. He was more worried about keeping his nose warm than throwing a decent pass. |
![]() Location: not sure if sun landing was faked or not? Registered: 01-11-2004 Posts: 25196 |
In his defense, the TD pass to Lee was pretty decent. And Martin could have caught that 3rd and long to put them in scoring position. But I get your point |
![]() Location: "hate groups" or whatever Registered: 09-22-2002 Posts: 40085 |
I absolutely agree and I certainly don't entirely blame Favre for last night's loss. I'm more pissed at MM for lack of preparation. But if all one can wish for is Favre's well being then you're going to be sadly disappointed and looking to make excuses for him. He's a great player and still has a ton of skills but he is a part of that failure. I want to see Driver get a ring. If there is a guy on this team that deserves it more than Favre it's Driver. He doesn't have a ring and all the guy has done is put up incredibly numbers for a 7th round pick out of Alcorn State. He's f'in fantastic! But he's only one guy and needs Favre just like Favre needs him. How do you not root for a guy like Driver? How do you throw your lot behind one player? |
Location: Indianapolis, IN Registered: 11-30-2007 Posts: 13 |
You are an angry person - let go of your hate... |
![]() Location: "hate groups" or whatever Registered: 09-22-2002 Posts: 40085 |
Write a book, you'll make 50 cents. |
Location: Flori-Duh Registered: 02-02-2000 Posts: 3602 | meant as reply to GBFanforlife didn't say he was close to good but exactly what help did he have. I would say the pass to Ruvell Martin was excellent except that Martin clanked it off his hands. They had no running game. They had no pass rush. It wasn't all on FAvre. It was a team loss. I would blame the loss on 1-McCarthys play calling 2-defensive non pressure-3-offensive line -4 running game or lack thereof- 5-Favre. |
![]() Location: Aaron Gordon: "I hope Tucson is celebrating because I'm about to be a west coast Wildcat." Registered: 04-03-2004 Posts: 13160 |
![]() Location: "hate groups" or whatever Registered: 09-22-2002 Posts: 40085 | I'm off to kick some puppies and do some day trading. |
Location: "It’s not a democracy. At some point, I will make the call." Registered: 10-04-2004 Posts: 21488 |
That and the lack of adjustments. Fine to have a game-plan, sucks to not deviate from it when it doesn't work. |
![]() Location: not sure if sun landing was faked or not? Registered: 01-11-2004 Posts: 25196 |
Our coach looked young last night. I think he may over analyze things. Why not go with what worked last time, instead of trying to surprise the Giants with a different scheme this time. And, while I love Driver, I want Tauscher to get a ring. They guy does his job, day in and day out with little accolade. He is the one I felt worst for last night. Tausch has been a 7th round blessing for Packer fans. |
Location: Flori-Duh Registered: 02-02-2000 Posts: 3602 |
which is a surprise after watching him this year. He really did make adjustments thru the year but last night he definetely had a brain freeze. The first giant game he made adjustments but last night he kept calling the same non worknig plays. Screen-Screen, screen, deep pass-Not one slant pattern that I remember. Totally out of character from watching MM this year.... |
Location: Carol Stream, IL Registered: 04-12-2000 Posts: 8313 |
I'm not sure why people think that the pass to Martin was that catchable. In perfect conditions it would have been a good grab. In my opinion McCarthy's play calling and Favre's play last night go hand in hand with last nights loss. For some reason McCarthy decided not to run in this game and that was the plan from the start. Favre has a choice in who to throw to. He made quite a few inexcusable throws along with flat out missing open guys. There were quite a few hits on Manning, he just made plays. |
Registered: 01-11-2002 Posts: 11714 |
It hit both of his hands. The conditions didn't seem to bother Burress or Toomer very much. I'm not signalling that play out as why we lost, but it was a catchable ball and it sure would have helped. |
Location: Indiana Registered: 01-13-2008 Posts: 34 | I will be sorry to see Brett go. The biggest reason for their success over the last 15 years. I've been a Packers fan for 45 years and I say Thank You to Brett for what he has done for the Packers! |
Registered: 07-26-2002 Posts: 6037 |
Yep. The Giants handled the cold better than the Packers. That's a problem when you play for a team that resides in Green Bay, Wisconsin. |
Location: Waking up when you got a baby, you feel like you drank a bottle of whiskey the night before, except the sh*t's in someone else's pants. Registered: 04-19-2001 Posts: 1410 | Having to rely on the arm of 38 year old after he's played 4 quarters in sub-zero temperatures is a recipe for disaster (also after playing 14 games during the season). In general, the NFL is a young man's game (so says the Master of the Obvious). Without a running game or a short passing game, the Packers were hosed. If they can't figure out a way to rely less on Brett next year, then we should expect the same next January, should they be so fortunate to get into the playoffs. That being said, I'll be happy if Favre sticks around and they support him better. His game experience and leadership are very valuable. But I would be equally happy if he decides to hang it up; I think a younger QB can bring some things to the table that Favre never will due to his physical limitations (running threat, less fatigue, etc.). |
Location: If your bladder is full you're in the right place. Registered: 01-19-2005 Posts: 9195 |
It hit him square in the hands and in stride. Cripes, a Pop Warner kid should make that catch 99 times out of 100, let alone a professional player. |
Registered: 01-20-2001 Posts: 5132 | Actually, receivers on both teams dropped more than their fair share of catchable balls. It's hard to catch a brick. |
Location: If your bladder is full you're in the right place. Registered: 01-19-2005 Posts: 9195 |
You've obviously never tried to deliver my stand-up routine. |
![]() Location: "hate groups" or whatever Registered: 09-22-2002 Posts: 40085 |
Absolutely! How can you not root just as hard for all of these guys? |
Location: Waking up when you got a baby, you feel like you drank a bottle of whiskey the night before, except the sh*t's in someone else's pants. Registered: 04-19-2001 Posts: 1410 |
Agreed; this Packer team is one of the easiest to root for. Good character, young talent, chemistry, low ego, etc. Think back to some of the turds we've endured. Bill Schroeder? Joe Johnson? Wayne Simmons? Chris Atkins? Joey Thomas? Ahmad Carroll? Or imagine being a Bengals fan! |
Location: Flori-Duh Registered: 02-02-2000 Posts: 3602 |
I don't think that rooting for FAvre means that you aren't rooting just as hard for Tauscher, Clifton, Driver, DAvis, Woodson, Harris or the 53rd player on the roster. But we look at those players with at least 5 yrs left with a possiblity to get back to the Championship game. FAvre might have played his last game for Green bay last night. His window of opportunity is less than the other players mentioned. And while those players have a lot of game left, FAvre at 38 is probably is closer to age hitting him than any of the other players. When Elway won his Super Bowl at 38, I am sure that Denver fans were just a little more happy for Elway than for Shannon Sharpe only because of the time left. If this was FAvre 5th or 6th year, I am sure most would say they would be rooting harder for Driver, Clifton or Taucher or maybe even Rob Davis. |
Location: NW Chicago Burbs Registered: 02-07-2000 Posts: 22036 |
I think it's fine to be a Favre fan. As great as he has been, an all-time great, and a player that will proudly be placed in the ring of honor when he is a first-ballot HOFer, there will always be a part of his legacy that will include almost as many monumental failures as triumphs. Most will say that it was his nature, even writing it off as such. We took the good with the bad for Favre's entire career in GB, and he has been the identity of this franchise most of that time. There is nothing to be ashamed about at all. But winning a Championship to me is just as great with or without him. I don't think that Aaron Rodgers will ever be better than Favre, because few will, but I hope he plays big in the big games. If you compare their statistical performances, Favre is far superior to a lot of QBs who played better in the biggest games. It only means he is what he is. Brett Favre has been a lot of things in his career- most of them great- but the one thing he has not been is clutch in the biggest games. I'm OK with that, I guess. It's better than the alternative. |
Location: The time has come for someone to put his foot down. And that foot is me. (Phx, AZ) Registered: 07-04-2001 Posts: 3916 | I have a tatoo on my left calf. It is the Packer G. It's a safe tat, cuz the team will never leave, and unlike players the Pack represents a great history. Players may leave, retire, or make mistakes in their personal life during or after their career. Who would want an OJ tatoo for example. Anyway IMHO, Packer First, Players second... thats the way Lombardi would have it. (I got my tatoo at Rick's which got some free publicity on Fox last night!) |
| Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 12 |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
Read-Only Topic
