Yeah, Marino was always showing up his wideouts on the field. I'm sure they deserved it sometimes, but he was quite demonstrative.

quote:

Originally posted by grbaypack:
Yeah, Marino was always showing up his wideouts on the field. I'm sure they deserved it sometimes, but he was quite demonstrative.

Having Cutler throw his arms up in disgust at our inept wide-receivers will at least be a departure from when guys like Mushin Muhammad would throw his arms up in disgust at our inept Quarterbacks .

B-N-D

quote:

Originally posted by chickenboy:

quote:

Originally posted by trump:
IMO, thats the way Cutler's demeanor always is ... I've never seen such a high profile QB bi?ch at his teammates and have a scowl on his face as much as Cutler has in the past.

Dan Marino.

I see your Marino and raise you one Jeff George. Biggest bitcher I can ever remember.

Tampon Manning does the same stuff.

Not to say I'm a big Rick Reilly fan. in fact, he kinda seems liek an arrogant jerk. But anyway, for one who leaned on the Cutler side of the Denver fiasco, I found this interesting:

"How arrogant can Josh McDaniels be?" The Denver Broncos' 33-year-old Boy Blunder boasted this week that his draft board had fewer than 100 names on it, which made it easy for him to make his picks. Less than a hundred names when 256 players were drafted? Most boards had 500-plus names on them! Furthermore, he said the Broncos had worked out nearly 30 players and all 10 of his choices were among those 30. In other words, "I'm not capable of making a mistake. If I didn't work the guy out, the guy wasn't good enough. Period." This is the same genius who traded one of Denver's first-round choices in 2010 to move up in the second round to take a 5'9'' defensive back—Alphonso Smith. To repeat: Boy Blunder used a first to take a second. And if the Broncos are going to be as lame as I think they're going to be—4-12 perhaps—that first-round pick will be very high. McDaniels is the worst combination of things: Terribly naïve and doubly confident. Bronco fans, you're screwed.

Good. I hope Denver folds ... Cutler is still a diabetic arse that has not won yet.

Reilly probably ball-washing for the "Jay Cutler Story" movies and book deal.

quote:

Originally posted by trump:

Cutler is still a diabetic arse that has not won yet.

As one who comes from a family of several diabetics, I can say most of them are good folk. A couple are arses. One's inability to produce insulin isn't a factor on their character.

So, not all arse's are diabetics in your family?

quote:

Originally posted by chickenboy:

quote:

Originally posted by trump:

Cutler is still a diabetic arse that has not won yet.

As one who comes from a family of several diabetics, I can say most of them are good folk. A couple are arses. One's inability to produce insulin isn't a factor on their character.

- Ok let me break it down.

Cutler is a diabetic. Cutler is an arse on the field. Cutler hasn't won yet.

I know, I know…it was one practice in shorts. But I couldn’t resist:

“Three things stood out on the offense in one practice: Cutler's white-hot velocity, the massive size of an offensive line built to protect an immobile pocket passer in Orton and the maddening frequency of dropped passes by the receiving corps.”

From a good Sun-Times article reminding Bears fans that Cutler can’t do it all by himself.

In reference to above post here is a little factoid for y'all: da Bears haven't had a 1000 yd receiver since Marty Booker in 2002!

quote:

Originally posted by chickenboy:
The bottom line is the Bears are better today then they were yesterday. The Broncos aren't better today then they were yesterday but are better off for the future and a couple of Anacin just kicked in. Can't see why both parties aren't estatic.

Chicken or Crowboy?

is this really necessary? we get it. you don't like chickenboy.

quote:

Originally posted by DeepChicago:

quote:

Originally posted by Blair Kiel:
DeepSchytcago...So essentially, you're saying "TBSS"? Preachin' to the choir here, arent' you?

I'm saying the Bears were 9-7 last year and the Packers were 6-10.

We've improved significantly.

Care to catch up?

Love this one!!! Oh, somebody hold me.

quote:

Originally posted by DeepChicago:
I'm saying the Bears were 9-7 last year and the Packers were 6-10.

We've improved significantly.

Care to catch point out how stupid I was to make this statment?

Yes please.

Awwww, necro-posting pre-season threads at the end of the year.

What a holiday treat.

Oh well, Merry 20/20 Hindsight to all!

Then don't troll in preseason.

quote:

Originally posted by The Artist fka TD:
Then don't troll in preseason.

Good idea, you should try it......all the time.

It's a Packers forum. The only one trolling is you. Now, go follow that college team of yours.

Great lets apply that approach to Wisconsin traffic laws. All out of state visitors will observe the rules while the residents fly around like drunken D-bags at the county fair demo derby. Should be great for tourism.

At some point someone needs to explain to me why bringing up an old post is such a bad thing. This is at least the 3rd time I've seen someone complain about this. Is it really too much to be held accountable for saying something even if it occurred months ago?

If everything we say is supposedly done in a vacuum, why bother saying anything intelligent at all? Just throw **** against the wall.

I don't think BearBite likes being called on the carpet