TimesFour Forum List  Hop To Forum Categories  Milwaukee Brewers    Hart's Arby

Moderators: El-Ka-Bong, VegasVic
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Picture of El-Ka-Bong
Location: We must (trade for/sign) (insert player name here) immediately for whatever price to save our franchise.
Registered: 01-11-2004
Posts: 13290
Posted   Reply With QuoteReport This Post  
Link

Hart, the Brewers' lone arbitration-eligible player still unsigned, filed for a $4.8 million salary in 2010. The team countered at $4.15 million. The Brewers wanted a deal by the end of business Friday, and club negotiator Teddy Werner and Hart's agent, Jeff Berry, had a series of discussions this week but were unable to reach an agreement.

-snip-

"We're not rooting for a hearing and we're not looking to break new ground," Berry wrote. "We simply want Corey to be compensated at the level which the salary-arbitration system has deemed appropriate."

I don't know the stats for how often guys lose, but I think Hart will lose this one. Now, I know on the open market that Hart would probably get more than a one year contract, but if that was the case, do you see Hart getting 4.8 million from a team for next year? I don't.
Picture of Coach
Location: Atlanta, GA via the Town of Lisbon, WI
Registered: 02-02-2000
Posts: 7415
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteReport This Post  
That's close enough where you may still see a settlement before a hearing.

Hardy got $5 Mil, who knows.

I agree the Brewers could win that one. It would be great to see him have a bounce back year and make that lineup a little bit longer.

The economics are still so screwed up in baseball it isn't even funny.
Picture of Tschmack
Location: Formerly from the home of your soon to be World Champion Vikings! Secure your spot on the parade route today!
Registered: 08-10-2001
Posts: 19110
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteReport This Post  
Very rarely have you seen these rulings go in favor of the club's offer. I don't know why that is because in normal arbitration hearings that I've been a part of it seems to me that the hearings are far more objective between the company and the employee (i.e. union). The facts prevail the vast majority of the time.

In MLB, it's like 95% slanted toward the employee, and it's almost like the "facts" - i.e. stats and pay history, don't matter. Why it's called an "arbitration" I have no idea, but then again I don't know the procedures and language contained within the MLB process.
Picture of El-Ka-Bong
Location: We must (trade for/sign) (insert player name here) immediately for whatever price to save our franchise.
Registered: 01-11-2004
Posts: 13290
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteReport This Post  
looks like the club pulled the offer.

"I made it clear that we filed a strong number. Our goal is not to go to a hearing but we'll do it if we have to. Our offer is off the table now. It was a hard deadline. We need to prepare for a case."

I don't really care who wins, as long as neither party is bitchy about it afterwords. Hart is entitled to try and make as much as he can, but if he loses he should fire his agent.
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

    TimesFour Forum List  Hop To Forum Categories  Milwaukee Brewers    Hart's Arby

©2000 - 2009 TimesFour