CHAT     LINKS
CAP_PAGE

Brett Favre

X4_Lounge NFC_North

CHEESEHEADTV IS HERE!! Packer World News & Info

    TimesFour  Hop To Forum Categories  Computers & Electronics    What is LAN vs 1394 Connection
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Picture of MesaPacker
Location: Waukegan, Illinois
Registered: 02-14-2000
Posts: 3720
Posted   Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
On my computer I have these 2 options. I would prefer to use the 1394, because it says it runs at 400 Mbps vs 100 Mbps for the LAN.
For some reason, I can only seem to use the LAN. I use a local cable company for Internet access.
When I click on 1394, my Internet goes dead. I dont know what 1394 is.
Picture of TimthePackerFan
Location: 400 Miles South West of Lambeau
Registered: 08-18-2000
Posts: 16667
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
1394 is called firewire, it's a dieing connection usually used for connecting external devices such as burners or hard drives where is LAN is used to make computers communicate with one another or to connect to a broadband modem.

Firewire was fast until USB 2 came out.
Picture of PackerHawk
Location: Out Wandering Around
Registered: 02-06-2000
Posts: 21036
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
Firewire is actually faster than USB 2.0 in real world application. USB 2.0 has a 480MB spec and Firewire is 400MB but Firewire is typically 30% faster on average because of differences in architecture. Firewire uses a more efficient peer to peer transfer. USB2.0 uses a master-slave transfer. Firewire transfers are controlled by the Firewire devices, USB 2.0 transfers are controlled by the PC which is usually busy doing other things.

Despite that, USB 2.0 is more widely used because it's a cheaper technology. The hardware itself is cheaper and there is no licensing fee like there is with Firewire.

It's like comparing SATA to SCSI. SATA has a higher maximum speed but SCSI is usually faster.
Picture of Henry
Location: American capitalism's greatest success . . . CHINA!!
Registered: 09-22-2002
Posts: 25881
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
quote:
Originally posted by PackerHawk:
Firewire is actually faster than USB 2.0 in real world application. USB 2.0 has a 480MB spec and Firewire is 400MB but Firewire is typically 30% faster on average because of differences in architecture. Firewire uses a more efficient peer to peer transfer. USB2.0 uses a master-slave transfer. Firewire transfers are controlled by the Firewire devices, USB 2.0 transfers are controlled by the PC which is usually busy doing other things.

Despite that, USB 2.0 is more widely used because it's a cheaper technology. The hardware itself is cheaper and there is no licensing fee like there is with Firewire.

It's like comparing SATA to SCSI. SATA has a higher maximum speed but SCSI is usually faster.


Firewire2 is 800 MB speed. The other advantage is can charge a device as well. It's Apple's technology so they integrate it into their computers.

You can network with Firewire between computers and other devices.
Picture of PackerHawk
Location: Out Wandering Around
Registered: 02-06-2000
Posts: 21036
Posted   Hide PostReply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post  
You can charge devices over USB as well. I know I do that with my phone and my IPOD Mini. Firewire does have a higher power output so I'd guess it would charge devices faster than USB.

You can also network PC's and other devices using USB.

Apple really shot themselves in the foot with the licensing fee for Firewire. If they hadn't done that, you would see it much more than you do today. IIRC, that was something Jobs pushed for despite protests from other execs in the company.

The funny thing is that all new IPODS are strictly USB interface to save money on production. They have eliminated their own technology from their most popular accessory. Nice move.
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

    TimesFour  Hop To Forum Categories  Computers & Electronics    What is LAN vs 1394 Connection

©2000 - 2009 TimesFour